Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA claimant sought disability benefits from the relevant insurance office after being partially employed following an industrial accident, which the insurance office denied based on a medical assessment finding no significant long-term limitations affecting her earning capacity in the current job market. The court upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical assessment, which indicated the claimant could perform work suitable to her training and experience with reasonable accommodations, was factually sound and legally appropriate, thereby supporting the conclusion that the threshold for granting the disability pension had not been met.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAClaimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial): The court upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical assessment, which indicated the claimant could perform work suitable to her training and experience with reasonable accommodations, was factually sound and legally appropriate, thereby supporting the conclusion that the threshold for granting the disability pension had not been met.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 100 |\n |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 4. April 2018 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Petra Oehmke, \n Bahnhofplatz 9, Postfach 976, 8910 Affoltern, |\n
\n|\n |\n gegen |\n
\n|\n |\n \n \n1. IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________ (Pensionskasse), \n Beigeladene, \n |\n
\n\n
\n