Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I 2012 8 • VG SZ I 2012 8 Generato dall'IA

Insurer's Right to Terminate for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition

Numero d'incarto I 2012 8
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The claimant sued to reverse the termination of a supplementary health insurance contract for daily sickness benefits and sought payment of outstanding benefits. The insurance company terminated the policy after the claimant submitted an application for disability benefits from the social security system, asserting that the claimant had breached the obligation to disclose the prior existence of a pre-existing condition when applying for the insurance. The court found that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the claimant had failed to disclose relevant information concerning a pre-existing medical condition that was linked to the subsequent claim for benefits, constituting a material breach of the duty of utmost good faith in the insurance application process.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Insurer's Right to Terminate for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition: The insurance company terminated the policy after the claimant submitted an application for disability benefits from the social security system, asserting that the claimant had breached the obligation to disclose the prior existence of a pre-existing condition when applying for the insurance. The court found that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the claimant had failed to disclose relevant information concerning a pre-existing medical condition that was linked to the subsequent claim for benefits, constituting a material breach of the duty of utmost good faith in the insurance application process.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
estinzione delle prestazioni assicurative stato anteriore assicuratore malattia assicurazione dell'indennità di malattia violazione dell'obbligo di informare assicurazione complementare
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2012 8 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 26. September 2012 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg und Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Natascha Venetz, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Beklagte, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Krankentaggeld und Kündigung des \n Versicherungsvertrages) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: