Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
GPR 2023 1 • KG SZ GPR 2023 1 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Order on Cost Consequences Following Criminal Prosecution

Numero d'incarto GPR 2023 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant filed a complaint against a prosecutor's order concerning the finality of a legal decision, specifically relating to cost consequences, following a criminal prosecution. The court president dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prior decision establishing legal finality regarding the costs was made appropriately and that the appeal against this determination was therefore unfounded and had to be rejected.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Order on Cost Consequences Following Criminal Prosecution: The court president dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prior decision establishing legal finality regarding the costs was made appropriately and that the appeal against this determination was therefore unfounded and had to be rejected.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale decisione motivata anticipo delle spese ritardo del ministero pubblico autorizzazione all’esecuzione azione di accertamento
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 9. Mai 2023 \n GPR 2023 1 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Kostenfolge) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 10. März 2023, SU 2022 6104);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: