Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
GPR 2022 9 • KG SZ GPR 2022 9 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings Regarding COVID-19 Mask Mandate

Numero d'incarto GPR 2022 9
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a defendant appealing a decision concerning the dismissal of criminal proceedings related to a COVID-19 mask mandate, seeking compensation and satisfaction in a second instance review. The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented, resulted in a specific disposition regarding the appeal against the public prosecutor's prior order, concluding the matter within the context of the criminal prosecution authority's actions.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Einstellung Strafverfahren (Covid-19-Maskentragpflicht, Entschädigung und Genugtuung; zweiter Rechtsgang) | Übertretungen andere Nebengesetze

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale procedure connesse decisione motivata divieto di dissimulare il proprio viso motivi di salute impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was cited in order to rule on the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
GPR 2021 9
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Mask Mandate Criminal Proceedings
GPR 2021 8
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Regarding COVID-19 Mask Compensation
STK 2023 44
Appeal of Conviction for Obstructing an Official Act and COVID-19 Ordinance Violation
BEK 2021 23
Appeal Against Timeliness of Objection to Penal Order for COVID-19 and Cannabis Violations
BEK 2022 155
Restaurant Owner Covid-19 Ordinance Violation Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was cited in order to rule on the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 29. Dezember 2022 \n GPR 2022 9 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 1. Abteilung, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Covid-19-Maskentragpflicht, Entschädigung und Genugtuung; zweiter Rechtsgang) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 26. Mai 2021, SU 2020 1265);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: