Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
GPR 2021 8 • KG SZ GPR 2021 8 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Regarding COVID-19 Mask Compensation

Numero d'incarto GPR 2021 8
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against the public prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings initiated by an individual regarding compensation and redress related to mandatory COVID-19 mask-wearing obligations. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the actions challenged did not constitute a criminal offense under the relevant statutes, thus affirming the prosecutor's decision to close the investigation due to the lack of a prosecutable crime.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings Regarding COVID-19 Mask Compensation: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the actions challenged did not constitute a criminal offense under the relevant statutes, thus affirming the prosecutor's decision to close the investigation due to the lack of a prosecutable crime.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
abbandono del procedimento obbligo della maschera delitto contro la persona inchiesta penale omissione del ministero pubblico ritiro della querela penale
Generato dall'IA
GPR 2022 9
Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings Regarding COVID-19 Mask Mandate
GPR 2021 9
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Mask Mandate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 124
Appeal Against Discontinuance of Criminal Proceedings Regarding Compensation
GPR 2021 6
Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Mask Fine Case Upheld; Compensation Denied
STK 2023 44
Appeal of Conviction for Obstructing an Official Act and COVID-19 Ordinance Violation

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 29. September 2021 \n GPR 2021 8 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 1. Abteilung, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren (Covid-19-Maskentragpflicht, Entschädigung und Genugtuung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Einstellungsverfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft des Kantons Schwyz vom 26. Mai 2021, SU 2020 1265);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: