Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
GPR 2020 18 • KG SZ GPR 2020 18 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Criminal Penalty Order for Public Urination Due to Untimely Objection

Numero d'incarto GPR 2020 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision regarding a criminal penalty order for the offense of public urination outside of sanitary facilities, where the appellant contested the deadline for filing an objection. The court reasoned that the appeal against the initial decision was inadmissible because the appellant failed to comply with the procedural requirement of filing the objection within the statutory timeframe, as the appeal itself did not cure the timeliness defect of the underlying objection filing.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Criminal Penalty Order for Public Urination Due to Untimely Objection: The court reasoned that the appeal against the initial decision was inadmissible because the appellant failed to comply with the procedural requirement of filing the objection within the statutory timeframe, as the appeal itself did not cure the timeliness defect of the underlying objection filing.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione deposito tardivo censure procedurali termine processuale perentorio requisito legale violazione dell'ordine pubblico
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 110
Appeal of Penal Order for Public Urination Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection
BEK 2019 8
Appeal Regarding Timeliness of Objection to Criminal Penalty Order Service
BEK 2021 71
Appeal Against Rejection of Untimely Objection to Criminal Penalty Order
BEK 2021 21
Appeal Against Dismissal of Untimely Objection to Penal Order
BEK 2025 54
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection to Criminal Penalty Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 15. Dezember 2020 \n GPR 2020 18 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft March, Postfach 162, Rathausplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Strafbefehl (Einsprachefrist; Verrichten der Notdurft ausserhalb sanitärer Anlagen) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht March vom 27. Oktober 2020, SEO 2020 19);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: