Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
GPR 2018 5 • KG SZ GPR 2018 5 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Court Costs After Discontinuance and Penalty Order

Numero d'incarto GPR 2018 5
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party sought relief from court costs assessed in connection with a prosecutor's decision to discontinue proceedings and issue a penalty order. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal concerning the cost assessment, reasoning that the imposition of costs was appropriate given the procedural history and the grounds for the original discontinuance and penalty order, thereby upholding the lower authority's decision regarding the financial liability.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Court Costs After Discontinuance and Penalty Order: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal concerning the cost assessment, reasoning that the imposition of costs was appropriate given the procedural history and the grounds for the original discontinuance and penalty order, thereby upholding the lower authority's decision regarding the financial liability.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese di procedura abbandono del procedimento riduzione della multa recupero delle spese esecutive esame della situazione economica dispensa dal versamento delle spese Kosten, Erlass | Wirtschaftl. Nebenfolgen max. Fr. 5\x27000.00
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 121
Appeal Regarding Cost Allocation After Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2016 191
Appeal Regarding Allocation of Procedural Costs After Investigation Discontinuation
BEK 2017 104
Appeal Against Cost Allocation Following Discontinued Criminal Proceedings
GPR 2018 2
Prosecutor's Discontinuation of Proceedings and Costs Appeal
BEK 2019 211
Prosecutor Discontinuance of Proceedings and Procedural Costs Imposition on Accused

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 13. Dezember 2018 \n GPR 2018 5 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin M.A. HSG Melanie von Rickenbach. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Kostenerlass (Einstellungsverfügung und Strafbefehl) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 26. April 2018, SUH 2017 1487);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: