Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
GPR 2018 11 • KG SZ GPR 2018 11 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute Deemed Inadmissible Due to Prior Review

Numero d'incarto GPR 2018 11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant, appealing a decision from the Cantonal Public Prosecutor's Office dated September 14, 2017, which declined to initiate criminal proceedings and addressed compensation, brought the matter before the Cantonal Court. The court reasoned that the appeal was lodged against a decision that had already been subject to a prior legal appeal process, specifically against the prosecutor's refusal to prosecute, thereby determining that the second instance appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decision had already been reviewed in the proper procedural manner.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute Deemed Inadmissible Due to Prior Review: The court reasoned that the appeal was lodged against a decision that had already been subject to a prior legal appeal process, specifically against the prosecutor's refusal to prosecute, thereby determining that the second instance appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decision had already been reviewed in the proper procedural manner.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
controllo della procedura omissione del ministero pubblico querela impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio opposizione ricorso per carenza
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 118
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 30
Appeal Against Refusal to Prosecute and Termination of Proceedings Due to Expiry of Statute of Limitations
BEK 2020 191
Appeal on Legal Standing Dismissed for Inadmissibility
BEK 2019 138
Appeal Against Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2024 193
Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Prosecute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 23. August 2018 \n GPR 2018 11 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren (Entschädigung); 2. Rechtsgang |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 14. September 2017, SUB 2017 250);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: