Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
GPR 2017 18 • KG SZ GPR 2017 18 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Institute Criminal Proceedings and Compensation Dismissed for Procedural Defects

Numero d'incarto GPR 2017 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision not to open criminal proceedings, also seeking compensation. The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant had not adequately substantiated their request for compensation and had failed to timely file the required separate appeal against the decision regarding the non-commencement of criminal proceedings, as the appeal against the initial decision was solely focused on the refusal to proceed criminally, not the compensation aspect.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal to Institute Criminal Proceedings and Compensation Dismissed for Procedural Defects: The court dismissed the appeal because the appellant had not adequately substantiated their request for compensation and had failed to timely file the required separate appeal against the decision regarding the non-commencement of criminal proceedings, as the appeal against the initial decision was solely focused on the refusal to proceed criminally, not the compensation aspect.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
vizio di procedura apertura della procedura difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico abbandono definitivo del procedimento ritardo ingiustificato dell'azione penale eccezioni processuali
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 10. Januar 2018 \n GPR 2017 18 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdeführerin, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, SSB, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren (Entschädigung) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 14. September 2017, SUB 2017 250);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: