Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2025 35 • KG SZ BEK 2025 35 Generato dall'IA

Traffic Violation Appeal Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2025 35
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant was convicted by the District Court for speeding. The cantonal court considered the appeal against this judgment, which challenged the finding of guilt concerning the traffic violation. The court ultimately upheld the initial conviction, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently established the appellant's culpability for the speed transgression as determined by the lower court.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Traffic Violation Appeal Upheld: The cantonal court considered the appeal against this judgment, which challenged the finding of guilt concerning the traffic violation. The court ultimately upheld the initial conviction, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently established the appellant's culpability for the speed transgression as determined by the lower court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
superamento del limite di velocità abbandono del procedimento per infrazione stradale fissazione della multa verdetto di colpevolezza risarcimento dei danni da incidente stradale decisione d'esecuzione Geschwindigkeitsüberschreitung | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2016 178
Speeding Violation Appeal Upheld
STK 2020 52
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
BEK 2018 116
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
STK 2022 10
Traffic Violation Speeding Conviction Upheld
STK 2021 22
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Appeal

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 23. Juli 2025 \n BEK 2025 35 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Geschwindigkeitsüberschreitung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 22. Januar 2025, SEO 2024 33);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: