Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant sought the revocation of a pre-trial detention order issued by the criminal court regarding a criminal case. The appellate court upheld the decision to maintain the pre-trial detention, reasoning that the initial court correctly determined that there remained a significant risk of the appellant absconding, given the gravity of the potential sentence and the established circumstances, thus justifying the continued detention as a necessary measure under the relevant procedural law.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order: The appellate court upheld the decision to maintain the pre-trial detention, reasoning that the initial court correctly determined that there remained a significant risk of the appellant absconding, given the gravity of the potential sentence and the established circumstances, thus justifying the continued detention as a necessary measure under the relevant procedural law.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 14. Oktober 2025 \n BEK 2025 125 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterin Annelies Inglin und Kantonsrichter Pius Kistler, Gerichtsschreiberin Patrizia Castellazzi. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Sicherheitshaft |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen den Beschluss des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 1. September 2025, SGO 2025 26);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: