Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2025 12 • KG SZ BEK 2025 12 Generato dall'IA

Private Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute

Numero d'incarto BEK 2025 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private litigant appealed a prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings regarding an unspecified matter. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed was sound, implicitly finding insufficient legal grounds or evidence to warrant the commencement of a formal criminal investigation or trial, thereby upholding the initial non-commencement order.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed was sound, implicitly finding insufficient legal grounds or evidence to warrant the commencement of a formal criminal investigation or trial, thereby upholding the initial non-commencement order.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inchiesta penale omissione del ministero pubblico azione penale privata divieto di rappresentanza dell'avvocato margine d'apprezzamento del ministero pubblico decisione di non sollevare obiezioni Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 81
Private Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute
BEK 2024 131
Appeal of Private Complainant Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute
BEK 2023 149
Private Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute
BEK 2021 177
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings Dismissed
BEK 2019 188
Private Appeal of Prosecutorial Decision Not to Commence Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 5. März 2025 \n BEK 2025 12 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiberin Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, 2. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 20. Januar 2025, SU 2025 339);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass