Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2025 113 • KG SZ BEK 2025 113 Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Prosecutor (Visitation Permit)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2025 113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a prosecutor's decision concerning a visitation permit, appealing a ruling made on August 26, 2025. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant had not demonstrated that the challenged decision concerning the visitation permit was manifestly incorrect or that the authority abused its discretion in imposing the conditions or denying the request.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appellant v. Prosecutor (Visitation Permit): The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the appellant had not demonstrated that the challenged decision concerning the visitation permit was manifestly incorrect or that the authority abused its discretion in imposing the conditions or denying the request.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
competenza del pubblico ministero diritto di visita sorvegliato eccezione di incostituzionalità cosa accessoria illecita violenza istanza di autorizzazione all’esecuzione – Decisione Besuchsbewilligung | Zwangsmassnahmen/übrige Zwangsmassnahmen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2025 114
Prosecutor's Denial of Custody Visit Upheld on Appeal
BEK 2021 86
Appeal Refused for Inadequate Contestation of Prosecutor's Reasoning
BEK 2021 183
Appellant v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Procedural Non-Admittance)
BEK 2023 85
Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Proceedings Upheld
BEK 2023 47
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor on Refusal to Prosecute

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 23. September 2025 \n BEK 2025 113 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterin Annelies Inglin und Kantonsrichter Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Besuchsbewilligung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 26. August 2025, SU 2024 6392);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: