Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2024 29 • KG SZ BEK 2024 29 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Provisional Execution of Debt Claim Based on Documentary Evidence

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 29
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant challenged a lower court's decision granting provisional execution regarding a debt claim, where the dispute centered on whether the respondent had successfully demonstrated the existence of a receivable by presenting sufficient, clear, and enforceable documents as required for provisional execution proceedings. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the documentation presented by the respondent, consisting of specific accounting records and related correspondence, was adequate to establish a prima facie case for the existence of the claimed receivable, thereby satisfying the burden of proof required for the provisional execution order to be upheld.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Provisional Execution of Debt Claim Based on Documentary Evidence: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the documentation presented by the respondent, consisting of specific accounting records and related correspondence, was adequate to establish a prima facie case for the existence of the claimed receivable, thereby satisfying the burden of proof required for the provisional execution order to be upheld.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
verosimiglianza onere della prova procedure connesse credito in esecuzione decisione esecutiva indicazione di provenienza provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 25. März 2024 \n BEK 2024 29 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________ Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 24. Januar 2024, ZES 2023 441);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: