Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2024 190 • KG SZ BEK 2024 190 Generato dall'IA

Affirmation of Parking Violation Conviction

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 190
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a lower court's judgment convicting them for exceeding the allowed parking time. The appellate court, upon review, affirmed the conviction, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently supported the finding that the defendant was responsible for the parking violation despite their appeal challenging the factual basis or legal assessment of the initial decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Affirmation of Parking Violation Conviction: The appellate court, upon review, affirmed the conviction, reasoning that the evidence presented sufficiently supported the finding that the defendant was responsible for the parking violation despite their appeal challenging the factual basis or legal assessment of the initial decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazione del divieto di sosta valutazione delle prove interpretazione della sentenza base fattuale conferma della competenza fissazione della multa Überschreiten der zulässigen Parkzeit | Strafgesetzbuch
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2013 148
Appellate Acquittal: Parking Prohibition, Insufficient Factual Basis, and Negligence Reversal
BEK 2024 79
Prosecutor v. Accused (Parking Meter Infraction)
STK 2020 52
Traffic Violation Conviction Appeal Upheld
BEK 2021 132
Speeding Conviction Affirmation Appeal
STK 2018 2
State v. [Appellant Name]: Affirmation of Traffic Violation Conviction and Sentence

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 22. Januar 2025 \n BEK 2024 190 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, \n 8832 Wollerau, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Überschreiten der zulässigen Parkzeit |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Bezirksgerichts Einsiedeln vom 12. Juli 2024, SEO 2023 7);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass