Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2024 189 • KG SZ BEK 2024 189 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Non-Initiation of Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 189
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The private complainant challenged the prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings in a second instance appeal, following earlier decisions by the prosecuting authority regarding two related matters. The court, in its ruling, addressed the complaint against the non-initiation of the criminal investigation and upheld the prosecutor's decision, implicitly finding that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold necessary to warrant pursuing criminal charges against the accused parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Non-Initiation of Criminal Proceedings: The court, in its ruling, addressed the complaint against the non-initiation of the criminal investigation and upheld the prosecutor's decision, implicitly finding that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold necessary to warrant pursuing criminal charges against the accused parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
denuncia penale omissione del ministero pubblico procedure connesse azione penale privata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio interesse ad agire
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2024 8
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 194
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 183
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2024 44
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2023 113
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 21. März 2025 \n BEK 2024 188 und 189 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Annelies Inglin und Viviane Liebherr, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, 2. C.________ und D.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren (zweiter Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügungen der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 14. Juni 2022, SU 2022 4627 und 4628);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: