Appeal Against Extension of Pre-Trial Detention
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellant, currently in pre-trial detention, challenged the decision to extend their detention. The court reasoned that the extension of pre-trial detention remained justified because the initial grounds for detention, specifically the significant risk of flight and the likelihood of obstructing the investigation, persisted, and the principle of proportionality was upheld given the seriousness of the alleged offenses and the ongoing investigative needs.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Extension of Pre-Trial Detention: The court reasoned that the extension of pre-trial detention remained justified because the initial grounds for detention, specifically the significant risk of flight and the likelihood of obstructing the investigation, persisted, and the principle of proportionality was upheld given the seriousness of the alleged offenses and the ongoing investigative needs.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 4. Dezember 2024 \n BEK 2024 184 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Annelies Inglin und Viviane Liebherr, Gerichtsschreiber Noah Thurnherr. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n
\n|\n betreffend |\n Verlängerung der Untersuchungshaft |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Zwangsmassnahmengericht vom 7. November 2024, ZME 2024 142);-
\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: