Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2024 175 • KG SZ BEK 2024 175 Generato dall'IA

Denial of Appointed Counsel Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 175
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed a prosecutor's decision denying the appointment of free legal counsel in connection with a criminal proceeding. The court considered the procedural history and the specific circumstances regarding the request for appointed counsel. The court reasoned that the requirements for granting state-funded legal representation were not met, upholding the prosecutor's initial decision to deny the application for free legal assistance to the appellant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Denial of Appointed Counsel Upheld: The court considered the procedural history and the specific circumstances regarding the request for appointed counsel. The court reasoned that the requirements for granting state-funded legal representation were not met, upholding the prosecutor's initial decision to deny the application for free legal assistance to the appellant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
patrocinio gratuito presupposto processuale domanda di designazione difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico segreto professionale dell'avvocato stato richiesto unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 101
Complainant's Appeal of Denial of Appointed Counsel in Criminal Investigation Phase
BEK 2022 79
Claimant v. Prosecutor's Office: Right to Appointed Counsel in Criminal Proceeding
BEK 2023 164
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Substantiate Need for Appointed Counsel
BEK 2019 146
Appeal Regarding Denial of Publicly Funded Legal Representation in Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 35
Denial of New Appointed Counsel in Fraud Case Upheld Despite Appeal Cost Award

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 21. November 2024 \n BEK 2024 175 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 24. September 2024, SU 2024 2111);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: