Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2024 169 • KG SZ BEK 2024 169 Generato dall'IA

Defendant Appeals District Court Finality of Penalty Order

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 169
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant filed a complaint against a decision by a single judge of the District Court concerning the finality of a penalty order. The Court of Appeal reviewed the matter and ultimately dismissed the complaint because the lower court's decision regarding the legal finality of the penalty order was deemed correct under the relevant procedural rules, meaning there was no legal basis to overturn the prior ruling.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Defendant Appeals District Court Finality of Penalty Order: The Court of Appeal reviewed the matter and ultimately dismissed the complaint because the lower court's decision regarding the legal finality of the penalty order was deemed correct under the relevant procedural rules, meaning there was no legal basis to overturn the prior ruling.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
decisioni incidentali controllo della commisurazione della pena gravità della pena denuncia penale decisione d'esecuzione azione di accertamento Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 171
Appeal Against Finality of Criminal Penalty Order
BEK 2025 54
Appeal Dismissed Due to Untimely Objection to Criminal Penalty Order
BEK 2025 102
Appeal Against Procedural Order Denying Finality of Penalty Order
BEK 2022 101
Appeal Regarding Finality of Untimely Penalty Order
BEK 2025 24
Defendant's Appeal Against Prosecutor's Determination of Penalty Order Finality Barred by Untimely Appeal of Penalty Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 12. Dezember 2024 \n BEK 2024 169 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Feststellung der Rechtskraft (Strafbefehl) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht March vom 24. September 2024, SEO 2024 27);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: