Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2024 166 • KG SZ BEK 2024 166 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal of Provisional Summary Judgment Based on Insufficient Foreign Payment Confirmation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 166
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party appealed a lower court's refusal to grant provisional summary judgment (provisorische Rechtsöffnung) regarding an alleged debt, where the appeal contested the initial decision finding insufficient documentary proof for the provisional measure. The appellate court dismissed the appeal because the underlying document relied upon by the appellant, a foreign payment confirmation, was insufficient on its own to establish an undisputed claim for summary judgment without further substantiation regarding the underlying contractual relationship or consideration.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Refusal of Provisional Summary Judgment Based on Insufficient Foreign Payment Confirmation: The appellate court dismissed the appeal because the underlying document relied upon by the appellant, a foreign payment confirmation, was insufficient on its own to establish an undisputed claim for summary judgment without further substantiation regarding the underlying contractual relationship or consideration.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pagamento provvisorio decisione straniera controprestazione contrattuale grave deficienza del procedimento all'estero procedimento europeo d'ingiunzione di pagamento procedimento pregiudiziale d'urgenza provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 14. Februar 2025 \n BEK 2024 166 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Annelies Inglin und Viviane Liebherr, Gerichtsschreiberin Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen B.________ GmbH, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 19. September 2024, ZES 2024 591);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: