Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2024 154 • KG SZ BEK 2024 154 Generato dall'IA

Enforcement Proceedings Cost Appeal Affirmation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 154
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party, as the respondent in enforcement proceedings seeking final leave to enforce a debt, appealed a lower court's decision regarding the costs and compensation awarded in the second instance, specifically challenging the ruling on costs following the rejection of their opposition to the enforcement request. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the allocation of costs and compensation, reasoning that the appellant's appeal was unsuccessful because the underlying debt instrument was deemed sufficiently clear and enforceable under the relevant procedural law, thereby justifying the lower court's initial grant of final leave to enforce and subsequent cost assessment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Enforcement Proceedings Cost Appeal Affirmation: The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision regarding the allocation of costs and compensation, reasoning that the appellant's appeal was unsuccessful because the underlying debt instrument was deemed sufficiently clear and enforceable under the relevant procedural law, thereby justifying the lower court's initial grant of final leave to enforce and subsequent cost assessment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese di esecuzione decisione esecutiva esecuzione della sentenza tassazione delle spese opposizione opposizione al precetto esecutivo
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 3. Dezember 2024 \n BEK 2024 154 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Annelies Inglin und Viviane Liebherr, Gerichtsschreiberin Antoinette Hürlimann. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung; Kostenund Entschädigungsfolgen (zweiter Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 28. Februar 2023, ZES 2022 510);-

\n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: