Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 74 • KG SZ BEK 2023 74 Generato dall'IA

Prosecutorial Discretion in Case Discontinuance Appeal

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 74
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private party appealed a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against a defendant, arguing the termination was unwarranted despite evidence suggesting an offense had occurred. The reviewing court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the decision to discontinue proceedings falls within the prosecutor's broad discretionary power regarding expediency, and the initial decision was not demonstrably arbitrary or an abuse of discretion, thus warranting no judicial intervention under the relevant procedural law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Prosecutorial Discretion in Case Discontinuance Appeal: The reviewing court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the decision to discontinue proceedings falls within the prosecutor's broad discretionary power regarding expediency, and the initial decision was not demonstrably arbitrary or an abuse of discretion, thus warranting no judicial intervention under the relevant procedural law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
principio di opportunità stralcio del procedimento potere discrezionale diritto processuale controllo della procedura decisione motivata Einstellung Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 157
Private Party Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2025 18
Private Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2023 89
Private Appeal of Prosecutorial Discontinuance Upheld
BEK 2022 170
Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2022 184
Appeal of Discontinuation of Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 30. Oktober 2023 \n BEK 2023 74 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt E.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 16. Mai 2023, SU 2020 1056);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: