Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 73 • KG SZ BEK 2023 73 Generato dall'IA

Judicial Disqualification Denied Based on Prior Professional Association

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 73
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party requested the disqualification of a judicial officer due to an alleged conflict of interest arising from prior professional association. The court reasoned that although a previous working relationship existed, the mandatory grounds for disqualification were not met because there was no indication that the judicial officer's impartiality was compromised in the current proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the request for recusal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Judicial Disqualification Denied Based on Prior Professional Association: The court reasoned that although a previous working relationship existed, the mandatory grounds for disqualification were not met because there was no indication that the judicial officer's impartiality was compromised in the current proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the request for recusal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
imparzialità del giudice procedura di ricusazione conflitto d'interessi associazione professionale violazione dei doveri professionali procedura direttrice Ausstand | Ausstandsbegehren
Generato dall'IA
ZK2 2019 76
Appeal Regarding Judicial Disqualification Based on Prior Professional Relationship
ZK2 2023 46
Appeal Regarding Judicial Disqualification Based on Prior Involvement
BEK 2019 88
Judge Disqualification Based on Prior Professional Relationship with Counsel
BEK 2020 73
Judge Disqualification Appeal Based on Prior Professional Relationship
ZK2 2019 40
Recusal Denial Based on Prior Judicial Involvement

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 29. Juni 2023 \n BEK 2023 73 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsteller, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n

\n (Gesuch vom 8. Mai 2023, SGO 2022 1);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: