Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 67 • KG SZ BEK 2023 67 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Detention Upheld Due to Inadmissibility

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 67
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision upholding the detention of the accused pending investigation. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decision, which maintained the pre-trial detention, did not constitute a final ruling on the matter but rather an interim measure, and therefore did not qualify as a decision against which a complaint could be lodged under the relevant procedural law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Detention Upheld Due to Inadmissibility: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the challenged decision, which maintained the pre-trial detention, did not constitute a final ruling on the matter but rather an interim measure, and therefore did not qualify as a decision against which a complaint could be lodged under the relevant procedural law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
carcerazione preventiva impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio diritti del detenuto misura cautelare eccezione di incostituzionalità proroga della carcerazione espulsione Untersuchungshaft | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2019 122
Appeal of Pre-Trial Detention Denial
BEK 2021 37
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Upheld
BEK 2021 155
Appeal Against Pretrial Detention Dismissed
BEK 2023 150
Appeal of Extended Pre-Trial Detention
BEK 2019 60
Appeal Against Detention Denied for Lack of Specific Legal Grounds

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 6. Juni 2023 \n BEK 2023 67 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungshaft |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Zwangsmass­nahmengericht vom 12. Mai 2023, ZME 2023 57);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: