Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2023 162 • KG SZ BEK 2023 162 Generato dall'IA

Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Flight Risk Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 162
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant, held in custody, appealed a lower court's decision to extend their pre-trial detention, which was initially ordered based on a risk of flight. The appellate court reviewed the circumstances, noting the ongoing investigation and the potential for the defendant to obstruct evidence or flee if released, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision to extend the custody because the statutory grounds for continued detention remained present and justified the deprivation of liberty.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Flight Risk Upheld: The appellate court reviewed the circumstances, noting the ongoing investigation and the potential for the defendant to obstruct evidence or flee if released, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision to extend the custody because the statutory grounds for continued detention remained present and justified the deprivation of liberty.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
carcerazione preventiva pericolo di fuga proroga della carcerazione espulsione motivi validi privazione della libertà pericolo di tortura Verlängerung der Sicherheitshaft durch 1. Instanz | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. Dezember 2023 \n BEK 2023 162 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Verlängerung der Sicherheitshaft durch 1. Instanz |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Beschluss des Strafgerichts vom 20. November 2023, SGO 2023 11);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: