Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 145 • KG SZ BEK 2023 145 Generato dall'IA

Traffic Violation Appeal on Evidentiary Assessment

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 145
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An appellant, charged with multiple simple violations of traffic regulations, appealed a district court's judgment. The Cantonal Court ultimately dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant's challenge to the evidence presentation during the lower court proceedings, specifically regarding the testimony of a witness whose earlier statement was allegedly not fully considered, lacked merit as the lower court correctly assessed the entirety of the available evidence when determining the facts.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Traffic Violation Appeal on Evidentiary Assessment: The Cantonal Court ultimately dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant's challenge to the evidence presentation during the lower court proceedings, specifically regarding the testimony of a witness whose earlier statement was allegedly not fully considered, lacked merit as the lower court correctly assessed the entirety of the available evidence when determining the facts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
infrazione alle norme della circolazione valutazione delle prove testimonianza istanza di autorizzazione all’esecuzione – Decisione inutilizzabilità delle prove illecite caso poco grave mehrfache einfache Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln | Strassenverkehrsrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 2
Cantonal Traffic Law Violation Appeal Upheld
STK 2025 10
Appeal of Traffic Violation Judgment
BEK 2024 6
Traffic Violation Appeal Affirmed
BEK 2020 125
Traffic Violation Appeal Upheld
STK 2023 82
Appeal Regarding Traffic Violation Judgment

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n , \n Verfügung vom 27. März 2024 \n BEK 2023 145 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache einfache Verletzung der Verkehrsregeln |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 3. Juli 2023, SEO 2023 9);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: