Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 143 • KG SZ BEK 2023 143 Generato dall'IA

Applicant v. Prosecutor re: Sealing Evidence in Criminal Investigation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 143
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An applicant, facing a criminal investigation, appealed a prosecutor's decision that rejected their request to seal evidence related to the proceedings. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the statutory prerequisites for sealing evidence were not met because the applicant, as a party to the criminal proceedings, had access to the relevant documents under existing procedural law, thereby negating the necessary condition of secrecy or necessity for sealing the file.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Applicant v. Prosecutor re: Sealing Evidence in Criminal Investigation: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the statutory prerequisites for sealing evidence were not met because the applicant, as a party to the criminal proceedings, had access to the relevant documents under existing procedural law, thereby negating the necessary condition of secrecy or necessity for sealing the file.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inchiesta penale documenti contenuti nel fascicolo procedure connesse doveri del ministero pubblico assunzione delle prove permesso di promuovere un procedimento penale Ablehnung Siegelungsgesuch | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 203
Prosecution's Denial of Access to Case Files Upheld
BEK 2025 101
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2017 28
Appeal Against Public Prosecutor's Objection Ruling in Criminal Investigation
BEK 2023 26
Prosecutor v. Defendant (DUI Appeal)
BEK 2019 155
Appeal of Non-Prosecution Decision Based on Insufficient Evidence

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 12. Dezember 2023 \n BEK 2023 143 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ S.A., Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ablehnung Siegelungsgesuch |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 23. Oktober 2023, SU 2020 804);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: