Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 135 • KG SZ BEK 2023 135 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Prosecutor's Office (Case Dismissal Affirmation)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 135
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

This case involves private plaintiffs appealing a prosecutor's decision to dismiss criminal proceedings stemming from an initial investigation. The court upheld the dismissal, reasoning that the evidence presented did not sufficiently support the allegations to justify continuing the prosecution, thus affirming the authority's determination that the case lacked the requisite grounds for trial.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Plaintiffs v. Prosecutor's Office (Case Dismissal Affirmation): The court upheld the dismissal, reasoning that the evidence presented did not sufficiently support the allegations to justify continuing the prosecution, thus affirming the authority's determination that the case lacked the requisite grounds for trial.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale domanda di ricusazione abbandono per lesioni personali mancanza di prova decisione motivata ritardo del ministero pubblico Einstellung Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 99
Appeal of Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2020 59
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor (Discontinuance of Proceedings Appeal)
BEK 2021 182
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Dismiss Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2017 168
Appeal Against Prosecutor's Dismissal of Indictment Upheld
BEK 2021 207
Complainant v. Prosecutor (Case Termination Appeal)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n \n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n \n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 29. Dezember 2023 \n BEK 2023 135 \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n \n Mitwirkend |\n \n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, \n Gerichtsschreiber Alen Draganovic. |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n \n In Sachen |\n \n 1. A.________, \n Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, \n 2. B.________ GmbH, \n Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, \n gegen \n 1. D.________, \n Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt E.________, \n 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, \n Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertreten durch Staatsanwalt F.________, \n 3. G.________, \n Privatkläger und Beschwerdegegner, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt H.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n \n betreffend |\n \n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Einstellungsverfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 2. Oktober 2023, SU 2021 9357);- \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: