Motion for Judicial Recusal Denied
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAAn individual, who was the accused and applicant, sought the recusal of a judge in an ongoing legal matter by filing a motion, which the opposing party opposed. The court found that the asserted facts, relating to a perceived professional relationship between the judge and the opposing party, did not establish a ground for judicial bias or a reasonable apprehension of partiality as required by law. Therefore, the court dismissed the request for the judge's recusal because the applicant failed to demonstrate a situation that would justify disqualification.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAMotion for Judicial Recusal Denied: The court found that the asserted facts, relating to a perceived professional relationship between the judge and the opposing party, did not establish a ground for judicial bias or a reasonable apprehension of partiality as required by law. Therefore, the court dismissed the request for the judge's recusal because the applicant failed to demonstrate a situation that would justify disqualification.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 20. November 2023 \n BEK 2023 126 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Gesuchsteller, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________, Gesuchsgegner, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Ausstand |\n \n\n
\n (Gesuch vom 14. September 2023, SU 2022 9437);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: