Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 118 • KG SZ BEK 2023 118 Generato dall'IA

Inadmissible Appeal Regarding Seizure Notice Due to Failure to Exhaust Lower Remedy

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 118
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An entity filed an appeal against a decision by the lower supervisory authority concerning a notice of seizure in debt enforcement proceedings, with the core issue being a challenge to that seizure. The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the prerequisite for appeal, namely a prior complaint to the lower supervisory authority regarding the seizure notice, had not been met, as the appellant failed to demonstrate that they had first exhausted this lower administrative remedy as required by law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Inadmissible Appeal Regarding Seizure Notice Due to Failure to Exhaust Lower Remedy: The court determined that the appeal was inadmissible because the prerequisite for appeal, namely a prior complaint to the lower supervisory authority regarding the seizure notice, had not been met, as the appellant failed to demonstrate that they had first exhausted this lower administrative remedy as required by law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
reclamo amministrativo previo procedura esecutiva organo dell'esecuzione forzata autorità amministrativa comminatoria di fallimento richiesta di pignoramento SchKG-Beschwerde (Pfändungsanzeige) | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 148
Debtor's Appeal Dismissed for Introducing Inadmissible New Facts in Seizure Objection Review
BEK 2021 210
Appeal Against Debt Enforcement Seizure Based on Non-Final Judgment Dismissed
BEK 2019 71
Appeal Inadmissibility in Debt Enforcement Proceedings Challenge
BEK 2020 113
Debt Enforcement Proceeding Appeal Inadmissibility
BEK 2021 170
Corporation Appeal of Seizure Order Inadmissible

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n \n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n \n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 29. Dezember 2023 \n BEK 2023 118 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n \n Mitwirkend |\n \n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, \n Gerichtsschreiber Patrick Neidhart. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n \n In Sachen |\n \n 1. A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n 2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n \n gegen \n \n Betreibungskreis Altendorf Lachen, Postfach 43, Seeplatz 1, 8853 Lachen, \n Beschwerdegegner, \n \n |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n \n betreffend |\n \n SchKG-Beschwerde (Pfändungsanzeige) |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Gerichtspräsidenten des Bezirksgerichts March als untere Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibungsund Konkurssachen vom 22. August 2023, APD 2023 9);-

\n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident \n als Vizepräsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass: