Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2023 111 • KG SZ BEK 2023 111 Generato dall'IA

Provisional Execution of Debt Collection Order Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 111
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court's decision granting provisional execution of a debt collection order, stemming from a dispute concerning a debt instrument. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court correctly found sufficient prima facie evidence to support the claim for provisional execution, as the submitted documents met the formal requirements for establishing an undisputed claim under the relevant execution law, thus warranting the interim measure.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Provisional Execution of Debt Collection Order Upheld: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court correctly found sufficient prima facie evidence to support the claim for provisional execution, as the submitted documents met the formal requirements for establishing an undisputed claim under the relevant execution law, thus warranting the interim measure.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
incasso verosimiglianza misura cautelare decisione motivata titolo all'ordine azione di accertamento provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 4. Oktober 2023 \n BEK 2023 111 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, |\n

\n\n

\n Gerichtsschreiber Noah Thurnherr. \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen C.________ AG, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertr. durch D.________ AG, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 14. Juli 2023, ZES 2023 191);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: