Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 106 • KG SZ BEK 2023 106 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Detention Order Revocation Denial

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 106
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a detention order issued by a single judge of the coercive measures court, where the accused sought the revocation of their pre-trial detention. The appellate court considered the factual basis for the detention, specifically addressing the ongoing suspicion of criminal activity and the necessity of continued detention to prevent reoffending or obstructing the investigation, ultimately upholding the lower court's decision by affirming that the conditions for detention were met and the detention remained proportionate.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Detention Order Revocation Denial: The appellate court considered the factual basis for the detention, specifically addressing the ongoing suspicion of criminal activity and the necessity of continued detention to prevent reoffending or obstructing the investigation, ultimately upholding the lower court's decision by affirming that the conditions for detention were met and the detention remained proportionate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
arresto coercitivo revoca della sospensione condizionale impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio sindacato giurisdizionale base fattuale eccezione di incostituzionalità Untersuchungshaft | Zwangsmassnahmen/Haft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2021 37
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Upheld
BEK 2020 97
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order Upheld
BEK 2019 171
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2025 125
Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Order
BEK 2017 174
Appeal of Pre-Trial Detention Order

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 25. August 2023 \n BEK 2023 106 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Untersuchungshaft |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Zwangsmass­nahmengericht vom 29. Juli 2023, ZME 2023 88);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: