Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2023 105 • KG SZ BEK 2023 105 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Conviction for Unauthorized Event Participation

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 105
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a lower court's conviction for participating in an unauthorized event. The appellate court examined the facts surrounding the alleged participation in the prohibited gathering and considered the grounds for appeal against the original verdict. The court reached its decision based on its interpretation of the evidence presented regarding the appellant's involvement in the unauthorized event.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Conviction for Unauthorized Event Participation: The appellate court examined the facts surrounding the alleged participation in the prohibited gathering and considered the grounds for appeal against the original verdict. The court reached its decision based on its interpretation of the evidence presented regarding the appellant's involvement in the unauthorized event.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio opposizione fissazione della multa procedura di infrazione eccezione di illegalità reati connessi Teilnahme an einer unzulässigen Veranstaltung | übriges Strafrecht
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 16. November 2023 \n BEK 2023 105 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Teilnahme an einer unzulässigen Veranstaltung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Einsiedeln vom 11. August 2022, SEO 2022 001);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: