Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 103 • KG SZ BEK 2023 103 Generato dall'IA

Railway Company v. Public Prosecutor (Private Prosecution Standing)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 103
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A railway company appealed a decision by the public prosecutor's office that rejected its application to be admitted as a private prosecutor in criminal proceedings concerning property damage, based on the claim that the damage caused by the accused significantly impacted its operations and assets. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the railway company suffered financial damage, the relevant statute regarding private prosecution in cases of property damage generally requires the injured party to be the direct victim whose rights were immediately and directly infringed, and the operational impact here was deemed too indirect or consequential to grant private prosecutorial standing, distinguishing between direct victimhood and broader economic detriment.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Railway Company v. Public Prosecutor (Private Prosecution Standing): The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that while the railway company suffered financial damage, the relevant statute regarding private prosecution in cases of property damage generally requires the injured party to be the direct victim whose rights were immediately and directly infringed, and the operational impact here was deemed too indirect or consequential to grant private prosecutorial standing, distinguishing between direct victimhood and broader economic detriment.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata diritti della vittima proprietà privata danneggiamento legittimazione a ricorrere omissione del ministero pubblico Zulassung als Privatklägerin | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 42
Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Locomotive Ownership Dispute)
STK 2022 18
Private Plaintiff v. Accused and Public Prosecutor's Office (Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal)
BEK 2017 81
Railway Company Appeal of Discontinued Rail Traffic Safety Prosecution Upheld
STK 2020 3
Private Prosecution Appeal of Property Damage Acquittal
BEK 2018 153
Private Complainant v. State Prosecutor (Locomotive Theft Investigation Procedure)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 4. Dezember 2023 \n BEK 2023 103 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB AG), Hilfikerstrasse 1, 3000 Bern 65 vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin A.________, Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Zulassung als Privatklägerin |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 17. Juli 2023, SU 2022 9593);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: