Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2023 101 • KG SZ BEK 2023 101 Generato dall'IA

Complainant's Appeal of Denial of Appointed Counsel in Criminal Investigation Phase

Numero d'incarto BEK 2023 101
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed a prosecutor's decision denying her request for appointed legal counsel in criminal proceedings, arguing that the initial proceedings, which involved a dismissal of charges followed by a partial reversal and continuation of investigation, necessitated legal representation she could not afford. The court, however, found that the request for free legal aid was correctly denied because, at the time of the application, the proceedings were not at a stage where legal counsel was mandatory or demonstrably indispensable for ensuring the rights of the complainant, thus upholding the prosecutor's original decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Complainant's Appeal of Denial of Appointed Counsel in Criminal Investigation Phase: The court, however, found that the request for free legal aid was correctly denied because, at the time of the application, the proceedings were not at a stage where legal counsel was mandatory or demonstrably indispensable for ensuring the rights of the complainant, thus upholding the prosecutor's original decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
patrocinio gratuito gratuito patrocinio inchiesta penale patrocinio obbligatorio mancanza di prova difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2024 175
Denial of Appointed Counsel Upheld
BEK 2022 79
Claimant v. Prosecutor's Office: Right to Appointed Counsel in Criminal Proceeding
BEK 2020 22
Appeal Against Refusal of Free Legal Aid for Private Complainant
BEK 2023 164
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Substantiate Need for Appointed Counsel
BEK 2020 170
Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid in Criminal Prosecution

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 2. November 2023 \n BEK 2023 101 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 19. Juli 2023, SU 2022 11019 und SU 2023 1435);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: