Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 89 • KG SZ BEK 2022 89 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Initiation of Bankruptcy Proceedings Based on Undisputed Debt

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 89
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant challenged a lower court's decision to open bankruptcy proceedings against them, where the opposing party had initiated the request based on outstanding debts. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial court correctly determined that the appellant had failed to substantiate their claim that the debt was genuinely disputed or cease to exist, thus upholding the prerequisite for initiating bankruptcy based on the established existence of the debt.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Initiation of Bankruptcy Proceedings Based on Undisputed Debt: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial court correctly determined that the appellant had failed to substantiate their claim that the debt was genuinely disputed or cease to exist, thus upholding the prerequisite for initiating bankruptcy based on the established existence of the debt.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
apertura del fallimento apertura della procedura opposizione al precetto esecutivo procedura di rivendicazione nel fallimento credito contestato assemblea dei creditori Konkurseröffnung | March ER SchKG/Liq.-Sachen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 69
Appeal Regarding Opening of Bankruptcy Based on Undisputed Debt
BEK 2017 30
Bankruptcy Proceedings Initiation Upheld Despite Debt Dispute
BEK 2021 176
Appeal of Bankruptcy Proceedings Initiation
BEK 2023 33
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Proceedings Due to Uncontested Debt
BEK 2018 100
Appeal of Bankruptcy Order Based on Disputed Debt

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 27. Juni 2022 \n BEK 2022 89 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Gabriela Thurnherr. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________ AG, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, \n vertr. durch C.________ AG, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Konkurseröffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht March vom 2. Juni 2022, ZES 2022 193);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: