Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 79 • KG SZ BEK 2022 79 Generato dall'IA

Claimant v. Prosecutor's Office: Right to Appointed Counsel in Criminal Proceeding

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 79
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private claimant appealed a prosecutor's office decision denying her request for publicly funded legal assistance in a criminal proceeding. The court considered whether the claimant, despite her financial situation, had a legitimate interest or necessity for assigned counsel under the relevant law, finding that the complexity of the case and the claimant's specific circumstances justified the need for representation, thus reversing the lower decision and granting the application for free legal aid.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF; Claimant v. Prosecutor's Office: Right to Appointed Counsel in Criminal Proceeding: The court considered whether the claimant, despite her financial situation, had a legitimate interest or necessity for assigned counsel under the relevant law, finding that the complexity of the case and the claimant's specific circumstances justified the need for representation, thus reversing the lower decision and granting the application for free legal aid.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
patrocinio gratuito gratuito patrocinio competenza del pubblico ministero diritti della difesa cancellazione dall'albo avvocati motivi unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung | UP/amtliche Verteidigung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF
This provision was cited in the dispositive section to regulate court costs.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2023 101
Complainant's Appeal of Denial of Appointed Counsel in Criminal Investigation Phase
BEK 2024 175
Denial of Appointed Counsel Upheld
BEK 2022 114
Defendant v. Prosecutor on Appointment of Defense Counsel
BEK 2022 159
Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Legal Aid Denial)
BEK 2019 154
Appellant v. Prosecutor: Denial of Legal Aid for Criminal Complaint

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 LTF

This provision was cited in the dispositive section to regulate court costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 17. Oktober 2022 \n BEK 2022 79 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 6. Mai 2022, SU 2022 3076);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: