Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 76 • KG SZ BEK 2022 76 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Intentional Animal Protection Law Violations

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 76
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The defendant appealed a prior judgment regarding multiple intentional violations of animal protection laws. The appellate court reviewed the case, which involved an appeal against the decision of a single district court judge concerning the repeated, intentional breach of animal welfare statutes. The court's reasoning, following this procedural context, led to its final judgment on the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Intentional Animal Protection Law Violations: The appellate court reviewed the case, which involved an appeal against the decision of a single district court judge concerning the repeated, intentional breach of animal welfare statutes. The court's reasoning, following this procedural context, led to its final judgment on the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
violazioni delle norme procedurali interpretazione delle leggi diritto agrario natura dell'infrazione sfratto decisione motivata
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 92
Animal Protection Law Violation Appeal Modification
BEK 2019 85
Animal Protection and Leash Law Violations Appeal
BEK 2022 119
Animal Welfare Violations Appeal Dismissal
BEK 2019 84
Animal Protection Violation Conviction Overturned Due to Insufficient Reasoning and Denial of Right to Be Heard
STK 2022 46
Appeal of Willful Animal Cruelty and Welfare Violations Conviction

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 9. August 2022 \n BEK 2022 76 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, SSB, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache vorsätzliche Widerhandlung gegen das Tierschutzgesetz (zweiter Rechtsgang) |\n \n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 28. Mai 2020, SEO 2019 31);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: