Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 72 • KG SZ BEK 2022 72 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Warrantless House Search Justification

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 72
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A defendant appealed a prosecutor's decision authorizing a house search, arguing the search violated procedural guarantees because the decision was not sufficiently reasoned regarding the necessary urgency and proportionality. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial decision, while brief, sufficiently indicated that the search was aimed at securing evidence related to the ongoing criminal proceedings and that the facts presented to the prosecutor at the time justified the immediate execution of the search as a necessary measure to prevent the destruction or concealment of evidence.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Warrantless House Search Justification: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the initial decision, while brief, sufficiently indicated that the search was aimed at securing evidence related to the ongoing criminal proceedings and that the facts presented to the prosecutor at the time justified the immediate execution of the search as a necessary measure to prevent the destruction or concealment of evidence.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
perquisizione domiciliare perquisizione decisione motivata impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio principio di opportunità diritto a un'inchiesta effettiva Hausdurchsuchung | Zwangsmassnahmen/übrige Zwangsmassnahmen
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 133
Warrant Validity and Evidence Admissibility Appeal
BEK 2020 4
Challenge to Validity of Search Warrant Due to Insufficient Grounds
BEK 2021 83
Prosecutor's Authorization of House Search for Stolen Bicycle Upheld
BEK 2019 121
Complainant v. State Prosecutor (Search and Seizure Justification)
BEK 2021 57
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Current Legal Interest in Executed Search Warrants

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 9. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 72 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Julia Lüönd. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, amtlich verteidigt durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Hausdurchsuchung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 25. Januar 2022, SU 2021 7299);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: