Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings and Private Prosecutor Status
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe appellants filed complaints against two decisions by the public prosecutor's office to discontinue criminal proceedings, as well as the decision regarding their status as private prosecutors and access to the case files. The court considered the appeals concerning the discontinuance of the criminal proceedings and the private prosecutor status of the complainants. The court's reasoning focused on the propriety of the public prosecutor's decisions regarding the cessation of the investigation and the subsequent procedural rights of the aggrieved parties concerning prosecution and file access.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings and Private Prosecutor Status: The court considered the appeals concerning the discontinuance of the criminal proceedings and the private prosecutor status of the complainants. The court's reasoning focused on the propriety of the public prosecutor's decisions regarding the cessation of the investigation and the subsequent procedural rights of the aggrieved parties concerning prosecution and file access.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision governs the allocation of court costs, which is mentioned in the final order regarding the rejection of the appeals.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n \n Beschluss vom 21. November 2022 \n BEK 2022 67 und 68 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n 1. X.________, 2. A.________, 3. B.________, 4. C.________, 5. D.________, 6. E.________, 7. F.________, 8. G.________, 9. H.________, 10. I.________, 11. J.________, 12. K.________, 13. L.________, 14. M.________, 15. N.________, 16. O.________, 17. P.________, 18. Q.________, 19. Y.________, 20. Z.________, 21.AA.________, 22. AB.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, alle vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt R.________, gegen 1. S.________, \n Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n
\n|\n |\n |\n \n|\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren, Privatklägerstellung und Akteneinsicht |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerden gegen zwei Einstellungsverfügungen und die Verfügung betreffend Privatklägerstellung sowie Akteneinsicht der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 4. April 2022, SU 2020 523 und SU 2020 524);-
\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: