Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 64 • KG SZ BEK 2022 64 Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecution Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 64
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

An individual, acting as a private prosecutor, appealed a prosecutor's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against multiple defendants concerning related case numbers. The appellate court addressed the prosecutor's decision not to initiate or continue the criminal investigation, upholding the initial discontinuance because the factual basis presented by the private prosecutor did not meet the threshold for criminal liability required to warrant further prosecution.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Private Prosecution Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Proceedings: The appellate court addressed the prosecutor's decision not to initiate or continue the criminal investigation, upholding the initial discontinuance because the factual basis presented by the private prosecutor did not meet the threshold for criminal liability required to warrant further prosecution.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale privata abbandono del procedimento inchiesta penale principio di opportunità cancellazione dall'albo avvocati ritiro della querela penale Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2025 18
Private Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2025 21
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2021 190
Private Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision to Terminate Proceedings
BEK 2018 146
Private Prosecution Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 157
Private Party Appeal of Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 21. November 2022 \n BEK 2022 64-66 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 3. E.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner 4. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt F.________, |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerden gegen die Verfügungen der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 4. April 2022, SU 2021 9526, 10126 und 10127);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: