Appeal Against Dismissal of Misconduct Proceedings
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IATwo complainants appealed a public prosecutor's decision to dismiss criminal proceedings against an accused individual, where the original complaint involved allegations of misconduct. The court upheld the public prosecutor's decision not to pursue the criminal case, reasoning that the facts presented in the appeal did not reveal sufficient objective grounds to overturn the initial determination that the prerequisites for criminal prosecution were not met.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAppeal Against Dismissal of Misconduct Proceedings: The court upheld the public prosecutor's decision not to pursue the criminal case, reasoning that the facts presented in the appeal did not reveal sufficient objective grounds to overturn the initial determination that the prerequisites for criminal prosecution were not met.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IATesto completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Verfügung vom 30. Juni 2022 \n BEK 2022 5 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________ GmbH, 2. B.________ GmbH, Strafanzeigeerstatterinnen und Beschwerdeführerinnen, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, gegen 1. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt E.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2022, SU 2020 4);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: