Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2022 182 • KG SZ BEK 2022 182 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 182
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed a public prosecutor's decision not to initiate criminal proceedings concerning an unspecified matter. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed, based on a review of the available evidence and procedural requirements, was not manifestly contrary to law or fact, thus upholding the initial decision to drop the investigation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the prosecutor's decision not to proceed, based on a review of the available evidence and procedural requirements, was not manifestly contrary to law or fact, thus upholding the initial decision to drop the investigation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inchiesta penale omissione del ministero pubblico controllo della procedura azione penale privata decisione di non sollevare obiezioni decisione motivata Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 30. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 182 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. C.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 15. November 2022, SU 2022 8481);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: