Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2022 180 • KG SZ BEK 2022 180 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Concerning Provisional Legal Authorization in Debt Collection

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 180
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a lower court's decision regarding provisional legal authorization stemming from a debt collection procedure. The appellant challenged the lower court's granting of provisional legal authorization, which permits immediate enforcement of a claim based on sufficient written evidence of the debt. The reviewing court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the submitted documents sufficiently established the existence and maturity of the debt as required under the relevant procedural law, thus justifying the provisional legal authorization granted against the appellant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Concerning Provisional Legal Authorization in Debt Collection: The appellant challenged the lower court's granting of provisional legal authorization, which permits immediate enforcement of a claim based on sufficient written evidence of the debt. The reviewing court upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the submitted documents sufficiently established the existence and maturity of the debt as required under the relevant procedural law, thus justifying the provisional legal authorization granted against the appellant.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
incasso controllo della procedura autorizzazione provvisoria decisione d'esecuzione esigibilità rinvio pregiudiziale provisorische Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung provisorische
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 31. März 2023 \n BEK 2022 180 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Gesuchsgegner und Beschwerdeführer, gegen B.________, Gesuchsteller und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n provisorische Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Küssnacht vom 14. Dezember 2022, ZES 2022 85);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass