Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 18 • KG SZ BEK 2022 18 Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Conviction Under Health Ordinance and Medicinal Products Act

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's judgment concerning violations of the Health Ordinance and the Medicinal Products Act, where the appellant sought reversal of a prior conviction. The appellate court reviewed the evidence and legal arguments presented regarding the prosecution for these specific regulatory offenses. The court's reasoning, while leading to a final decision, focused on affirming or modifying the initial findings based on the application of the relevant health and medicinal product legislation to the established facts of the violation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal of Conviction Under Health Ordinance and Medicinal Products Act: The appellate court reviewed the evidence and legal arguments presented regarding the prosecution for these specific regulatory offenses. The court's reasoning, while leading to a final decision, focused on affirming or modifying the initial findings based on the application of the relevant health and medicinal product legislation to the established facts of the violation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
medicinali legislazione sanitaria querela motivi di salute interpretazione delle leggi contravvenzione alla legge federale sugli stupefacenti
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 93
Appeal Regarding Health Ordinance and Medicinal Products Act Violations
BEK 2020 17
Federal Act on Therapeutic Products Violations Appeal
STK 2025 6
Drug, Weapons, and Radiation Law Conviction Appeal
BEK 2024 71
Appeal of COVID Ordinance and Official Order Violations
STK 2021 30
Criminal Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Conviction and Therapeutic Measure

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 16. Mai 2022 \n BEK 2022 18 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Kantonsrichter Josef Reichlin und Bettina Krienbühl, Gerichtsschreiberin lic. iur. Antoinette Hürlimann, LL.M. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer, erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft (vormals Staatsanwaltschaft Innerschwyz), 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Widerhandlung gegen die Gesundheitsverordnung (aGesV) und das Heilmittelgesetz (HMG); zweiter Rechtsgang |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung gegen das Urteil der Einzelrichterin am Bezirksgericht Schwyz vom 28. Februar 2018, SEO 2014 34);- \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: