Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 165 • KG SZ BEK 2022 165 Generato dall'IA

Private Appeal of Defamation Proceedings Dismissal Upheld

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 165
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private litigant appealed a district court's decision to discontinue criminal proceedings against an accused party, concerning an allegation of defamation, where the initial decision found insufficient evidence to proceed to trial. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court correctly assessed the evidence and correctly determined that the threshold for continuing the prosecution was not met, specifically finding that the factual allegations supporting the defamation charge were not sufficiently substantiated to warrant a formal indictment against the accused.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG; Private Appeal of Defamation Proceedings Dismissal Upheld: The appellate court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the lower court correctly assessed the evidence and correctly determined that the threshold for continuing the prosecution was not met, specifically finding that the factual allegations supporting the defamation charge were not sufficiently substantiated to warrant a formal indictment against the accused.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
procedura per diffamazione azione penale privata abbandono definitivo del procedimento decreto di rinvio a giudizio ritiro della querela penale legittimazione a ricorrere Einstellung Strafverfahren | Höfe BG Strafsachen

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 63
Appeal of Defamation Charge Dismissal Affirmed
BEK 2024 130
Private Appeal of Criminal Proceeding Dismissal Upheld
BEK 2021 185
Private Complainant's Appeal Dismissed in Trespassing and Defamation Case
BEK 2021 33
Private Appeal of Refusal to Prosecute Defamation Upheld
BEK 2019 143
Private Appeal of Discontinuation of False Testimony and Defamation Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG)

The court explicitly ordered the losing party to bear the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 2. Oktober 2023 \n BEK 2022 165 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. C.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 1. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Einsiedlerstrasse 55, 8836 Bennau, Anklagebehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Einstellung Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen den Beschluss der Kammer 1 des Bezirksgerichts Höfe vom 23. November 2022, SGO 2022 1);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: