Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 162 • KG SZ BEK 2022 162 Generato dall'IA

AG and GmbH v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Private Prosecutor Status)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 162
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two entities, an AG and a GmbH, filed a complaint against a decision by the Public Prosecutor's Office concerning their status as private prosecutors in criminal proceedings involving two other AGs. The court was considering the appeal against the Public Prosecutor's Office's ruling that denied the appellants the status of private prosecutors in the ongoing investigation. The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented and the relevant procedural law, led to the dismissal of the appeal and the confirmation of the lower authority's decision regarding the appellants' standing in the matter.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

AG and GmbH v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Private Prosecutor Status): The court was considering the appeal against the Public Prosecutor's Office's ruling that denied the appellants the status of private prosecutors in the ongoing investigation. The court's reasoning, based on the facts presented and the relevant procedural law, led to the dismissal of the appeal and the confirmation of the lower authority's decision regarding the appellants' standing in the matter.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ammissione del pubblico ministero poteri pubblici denuncia penale legittimazione a ricorrere corporazione di diritto pubblico ricorso del personale Stellung als Privatklägerinnen | Übriges Strafprozessrecht
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 17
Private Complainants v. Public Prosecutor (Dismissal of Abuse of Office Charges)
BEK 2022 67
Appeal Against Decision to Discontinue Criminal Proceedings and Private Prosecutor Status
BEK 2019 10
Private Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Abuse of Office Proceedings)
BEK 2023 103
Railway Company v. Public Prosecutor (Private Prosecution Standing)
BEK 2019 114
Cantonal Prosecutor's Decision Upheld: Denial of Private Prosecutor Status

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 27. Dezember 2022 \n BEK 2022 162 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________ AG, Beschwerdeführerin, 2. B.________ GmbH, Beschwerdeführerin, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin D.________, 2. E.________ AG, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 3. F.________ AG, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Stellung als Privatklägerinnen |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 24. November 2022, SU 2021 4915 und SU 2022 9118);- \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung, dass