Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 159 • KG SZ BEK 2022 159 Generato dall'IA

Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Legal Aid Denial)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 159
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A private complainant appealed a public prosecutor's refusal to grant them legal aid for a criminal prosecution matter. The court considered the complainant's financial situation, noting that while they claimed inability to cover costs, they had sufficient assets and income such that granting the request for state-funded legal assistance would be an undue burden on public funds, leading the court to uphold the prosecutor's decision to deny the application for free legal services.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Complainant v. Public Prosecutor (Legal Aid Denial): The court considered the complainant's financial situation, noting that while they claimed inability to cover costs, they had sufficient assets and income such that granting the request for state-funded legal assistance would be an undue burden on public funds, leading the court to uphold the prosecutor's decision to deny the application for free legal services.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
gratuito patrocinio azione penale privata sostanza privata reddito sufficiente omissione del ministero pubblico aiuti concessi dagli Stati unentgeltliche Rechtspflege | UP/amtliche Verteidigung
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 22
Appeal Against Refusal of Free Legal Aid for Private Complainant
BEK 2020 170
Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid in Criminal Prosecution
BEK 2019 146
Appeal Regarding Denial of Publicly Funded Legal Representation in Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2019 168
Cantonal Public Prosecutor's Office v. Legal Aid Denial Appeal
BEK 2018 150
Plaintiff's Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Assistance Upheld

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 13. Januar 2023 \n BEK 2022 159 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin lic. iur. Daniela Pérez-Steiner, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, Postfach 1201, 6431 Schwyz, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtspflege |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 16. November 2022, SU 2022 9009);- \n \n \n \n hat die Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsidentin, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: