Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2022 149 • KG SZ BEK 2022 149 Generato dall'IA

Enforcement Terms Challenge Dismissed

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 149
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party filed a complaint against the terms of auction and encumbrance list set by an enforcement office, which followed a lower court's decision affirming those terms. The reviewing court dismissed the complaint, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate how the challenged terms regarding the mandatory deposit amount and the timing of the auction were unlawful or procedurally incorrect, thus upholding the original determination as it did not constitute an abuse of discretion or violate applicable enforcement law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Enforcement Terms Challenge Dismissed: The reviewing court dismissed the complaint, reasoning that the appellant failed to demonstrate how the challenged terms regarding the mandatory deposit amount and the timing of the auction were unlawful or procedurally incorrect, thus upholding the original determination as it did not constitute an abuse of discretion or violate applicable enforcement law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
condizioni dell'incanto decisione d'esecuzione credito in esecuzione sequestro di beni annullamento del lodo arbitrale oggetto della lite Beschwerde gegen Steigerungsbedingungen/Lastenverzeichnis | SchKG-Beschwerde
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2022 56
Appeal Against Rejection of Claims in Property Auction Encumbrance List
BEK 2020 14
Appeal Dismissed in Debt Enforcement Challenge
BEK 2018 148
Company v. Enforcement Decision Appeal Dismissal
BEK 2024 207
Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Defects in Enforceability Challenge
BEK 2017 185
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Challenge Enforcement Title Validity

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 15. November 2022 \n BEK 2022 149 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschwerdeführer, gegen Betreibungsamt Steinen, Postfach 23, Herrengasse 23, 6431 Schwyz, Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Beschwerde gegen Steigerungsbedingungen/Lastenverzeichnis |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Präsidenten des Bezirksgerichts Schwyz vom 5. Oktober 2022, APD 2022 22);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident \n als Vizepräsident der oberen kantonalen Aufsichtsbehörde in Schuldbetreibung und Konkurs (Beschwerdekammer), \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: