Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2022 146 • KG SZ BEK 2022 146 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Enforceability of Acknowledgment of Debt for Definitive Authorization

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 146
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal against a lower court's order granting definitive legal authorization for a debt, where the appellant contested the procedural validity of the enforcement document, arguing it was not an enforceable title because it was not a formally executed or notarized document as required by law for definitive authorization proceedings. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the document—a partially executed acknowledgment of debt with an explicit declaration of irrevocability concerning the debt amount—met the formal requirements of an enforceable title because the appellant had unequivocally and substantially acknowledged the existence and amount of the debt in writing, thereby satisfying the statutory prerequisite for definitive legal authorization even if it lacked full notarial certification.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Enforceability of Acknowledgment of Debt for Definitive Authorization: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the document—a partially executed acknowledgment of debt with an explicit declaration of irrevocability concerning the debt amount—met the formal requirements of an enforceable title because the appellant had unequivocally and substantially acknowledged the existence and amount of the debt in writing, thereby satisfying the statutory prerequisite for definitive legal authorization even if it lacked full notarial certification.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
riconoscimento di debito validità dell'esecuzione titolo esecutivo requisito legale decisioni incidentali procuratore definitive Rechtsöffnung | Rechtsöffnung definitive
Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 21. Oktober 2022 \n BEK 2022 146 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________ AG, Gesuchsgegnerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen B.________ AG, Gesuchstellerin und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n definitive Rechtsöffnung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung des Einzelrichters am Bezirksgericht Höfe vom 23. September 2022, ZES 2022 573);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: